Oslo 2013
|
13th General Meeting of the European Council on Eating Disorders (ECED)
www.ecedoslo2013.net |
To be determined |
Florence 2011
|
Debate No 1: |
"As health care professinals we have the duty to campaign against pro-eating disorders websites." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Sandra Sassaroli (Italy) Eric van Furth (Netherlands) David Clinton (Sweden) |
Debate No 2: |
"Full recovery is a false treatment promise for adults with a chronic eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Søren Nielsen (Denmark)
Erika Toman (Switzerland)
Geoffrey Buckett (Australia) |
London 2009
|
Debate No 1: |
“This house believes we should invest much more of our limited resources into preventing eating disorders” |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J Hubert Lacey (London, UK)
Runi Børresen (Oslo, N)
Eric van Furth (Leidschendam, NL)
Kristine Dietz Godt (DK)
|
Debate No 2: |
“This house believes that information-sharing and carer involvement in the treatment of severe eating disorders should take precedence over confidentiality” |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Günther Rathner (Innsbruck, A)
Susan Ringwood (London, UK)
Bridget Dolan (London, UK)
Erika Toman (Zurich, CH)
|
Porto 2007
|
Debate No 1: |
"The fashion industry has a great responsibility in the development of eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (London, UK)
Greta Noordenbos (Leiden, NL)
Cynthia M. Bulik (Chapel Hill, USA)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Randomized treatment trials in anorexia nervosa are a waste of time." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Hana Papežová (Prague CZ)
Finn Skårderud (Oslo, N)
David Clinton (Stockholm, S)
|
Debate No 3: |
"A focus on weight or BMI undermines the treatment of eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Daniel Sampaio (Porto, P)
Bryan Lask (London, UK)
Riccardo Dalle Grave (Verona, I)
|
Innsbruck 2005
|
Debate No 1: |
"The treatment of AN has no impact on the natural history of the disorder." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (London, UK)
Cynthia M. Bulik (Chapel Hill, USA)
Fernando Fernández-Aranda (Barcelona, Spain)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Manualized treatments are to good therapy what cheap ready to wear clothes are to made-to-measure clothes." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Eric F. van Furth (Leidschendam, NL)
Robert Palmer (Leicester, UK)
Christopher Fairburn (Oxford, UK)
|
Debate No 3: |
"DSM and ICD should include Obesity as an Eating Disorder." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Hans Wijbrand Hoek (The Hague, NL)
Anna Keski-Rahkonen (Helsinki, Finland)
Simon Gowers (Liverpool, UK)
|
Budapest 2003
|
Debate No 1: |
"Clinical professionals who themselves have
a history of an Eating disorder are at a disadvantage when trying
to treat patients with these conditions." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Alex Yellowlees (UK)
Robert Palmer (UK)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Parents are partly responsible for the development
of eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Gerald Russell (UK)
Walter Vandereycken (Belgium)
Ulf Wallin (Sweden)
|
Debate No 3: |
"DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria are a handicap
to the treatment of eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Irena Namyslowska (Poland)
Mervat Nasser (UK)
Hans W. Hoek (The Netherlands)
|
Barcelona 2001
|
Debate No 1: |
"In anorexia nervosa, return to normal body
weight is the most important criterion of recovery." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Gerald Russell (UK)
Angela Favaro (Italy)
Johan Vanderlinden (Belgium)
|
Debate No 2: |
"When research funding is restricted, the
available money should go to genetic rather than to psychosocial
research in eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Günther Rathner (Austria)
David Collier (UK)
Hans W. Hoek (The Netherlands)
|
Debate No 3: |
"If a patient with bulimia nervosa has not
responded to repeated and intensive therapy over two years,
only palliative treatment should be made available." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Manfred M. Fichter (Germany)
Ulrike Schmidt (UK)
|
Debate No 4: |
"The significance of body image in eating
disorders." |
Chairperson:
Lecturer:
Discussant: |
Walter Vandereycken (Belgium)
Peter Beumont (Australia) (spoken by W. Vandereycken)
Fernando Fernández-Aranda (Spain)
|
Stockholm 1999
|
Debate No 1: |
"Binge Eating Disorder is a hoax aimed at
the American insurance companies, and should never have been
included in the DSM-IV." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Ulrike Schmidt (UK)
Martina de Zwaan (Austria)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Inpatient treatments for anorexia nervosa
is usually counterproductive and should be avoided." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Walter Vandereycken (Belgium)
Ivan Eisler (UK)
Eric van Furth (The Netherlands)
|
Debate No 3: |
"The one-sided stress on Cognitive Behavioural
Therapy (CBT) as the treatment of choice for bulimia nervosa
has impeded the development of other effective psychotherapy
methods." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Günther Rathner (Austria)
Finn Skårderud (Norway)
Glenn Waller (UK)
|
Padova 1997
|
Debate No 1: |
"Recovery is an impossible treatment goal
in chronic anorexia nervosa." Case presentation and discussion. |
Chair:
Discussants: |
Ricardo Dalle Grave (Italy)
Katherine Halmi (USA.)
Eric van Furth (The Netherlands)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Bulimic patients can be differentiated according
to the degree of impulsiveness." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Johan Vanderlinden (Belgium)
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Angela Favaro (Italy)
|
Debate No 3: |
"Drug therapy is the treatment of choice
in bulimia nervosa." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Gerald Russell (UK)
Francesca Brambilla (Italy)
Corinna Jacobi (Germany)
|
Dublin 1995
|
Debate No 1: |
"Which therapies work?" |
Chair:
Speakers: |
Noel Walsh (Ireland)
Ivan Eisler (UK)
Martina de Zwaan (Austria)
Mary Darby (Ireland)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Compulsory treatment of eating disorders
is unnecessary." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Günther Rathner (Austria)
Sarah McClusky (UK)
|
Debate No 3: |
"Studying brain function will tell us more
about eating disorders than studying society." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Edward Stonehill (UK)
Brian Lask (UK)
Runi Børreson (Norway)
|
Praha 1993
|
Debate No 1: |
"Psychotherapy with a starving patient is
impossible without weight gain." |
Chair:
Speakers: |
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Peter J.V. Beumont (AUS)
Ricardo Dalle Grave (Italy)
Christopher Dare (UK)
Johan Vanderlinden (Belgium)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Gull and Lasegue were right: we need to
separate the patient from the parents." |
Chair:
Speakers: |
Irena Namyslowska (Poland)
Josefina Castro Fornieles (Spain)
Phillippe. Jeammet (France)
Paul Robinson (UK)
Eric van Furth (The Netherlands)
|
Debate No 3: |
"Primary prevention is impossible and secondary
prevention is a waste of time." |
Chair:
Speakers: |
Walter Vandereycken (Belgium)
Charlotte Buhl (Norway)
Ivan Eisler (UK)
Hans W. Hoek (The Netherlands)
Peter Slade (UK)
|
Debate No 4: |
"Same problems - different countries?" |
Chair:
Speakers: |
Bridget Dolan (UK)
Manfred Fichter (Germany)
Dubravka Kocijan-Hercigonja (Croatia)
Günther Rathner (Austria)
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen (Switzerland)
Ferenc Túry (Hungary)
|
Leuven 1991
|
Debate No 1: |
"In-patient versus out-patient treatment." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Janet Treasure (UK)
Rolf Meermann (Germany)
Jan Norré (Belgium)
|
Debate No 2: |
"Drug treatment versus psychotherapy" |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Guido Pieters (Belgium)
Peter J.V.Beumont (Australia)
Peter J. Cooper (UK)
|
Debate No 3: |
"Sexual problems - cause or consequence." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Bridget Dolan (UK)
Ellie van Vreckem (Belgium)
Glenn Waller (UK)
|
Inaugural meeting London
1989
|
Debate No 1: |
"The differentiation of anorexia nervosa
and bulimia nervosa should be based upon binge eating rather
than upon body weight." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Michael P. Bourke (IRL)
Christopher Fairburn (UK)
Arthur H. Crisp (UK)
|
Debate No 2: |
"The investigation of biological factors
is more important for management of eating disorders than the
understanding of cultural and familial factors." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
J. Hubert Lacey (UK)
Karl Martin Pirke (Germany)
Tilman Habermas (Germany)
|
Debate No 3: |
"Compulsory treatment of anorexia nervosa
is more beneficial for the therapist rather than the patient." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Imela Florin (Germany)
Robert Palmer (UK)
Gerald Russell (UK)
|
Debate No 4: |
"Education campaigns will deviate resources
and may be ineffective in reducing the incidence of eating disorders." |
Chair:
Pro:
Con: |
Edward Stonehill (UK)
???
Peter Slade (UK)
|